Representative Charles Rangel Censured

NOVEMBER 19, 2010 by Bill Abbott

House of Representatives democrat Charles Rangel is currently facing House censure due to a number of recently discovered rules infractions based on conduct guidelines set forth by the House.

This isn’t Rangel’s first time in the spotlight. He was recently asked to quietly leave the Ways and Means Committee when faced with allegations of violation the congressional “gift ban”. When it comes to law makers who handle important legislation like the Jones Act, and any Jones Act lawyer, the public deserves to know how representatives are acting and handling their positions of power. This comes in addition to their handling and personal view points on the Jones Act and legislation affecting injured workers or a Jones Act lawyer defending those workers.

Rangel, who is 80 years old, asked for mercy due to his long-standing service in the House of Representatives. Rather than face criminal charges or severe legal implications, Rangel was instead censured. Censure in the House is not as severe a matter as expulsion, meaning that a House rep is still allowed to keep his position in the House and vote on matters that could affect maritime workers and a Jones Act lawyer.

Censure is controversial in many circles in the media, around proponents of the Jones Act, and with many a Jones Act lawyer. Because censure implies no criminal investigation or penalty, little is done to the offending representative. More often than not, the censure is more a “mark of disapproval” among other representatives who have various outlooks when it comes to important legislation regarding maritime law and the Jones Act. A Jones Act lawyer knows that censure is often a non-extreme punishment for extreme activities that would land other ordinary citizens in jail.

Other reasons for censure may include improper financial conduct, accepting of gifts (which Rangel was initially accused of), or any other violation of House rules that “bring shame” to the Senate. For anyone interested in Jones Act law such as a Houston Jones Act lawyer or an injured maritime worker, how the conduct of representatives and senators is viewed within the eyes of Congress is a big deal. Ordinary citizens, including maritime laborers, their families, and any Jones Act lawyer wants to know that their best interests are at heart with the representatives who are elected.

Censure is little more than a slap on the wrist. Though it may affect how the representative is seen in the eyes of his or her peers, it leaves little room for the type of justice an ordinary American wants to see. From a Jones Act lawyer to a maritime worker to a maritime attorney Houston, ordinary Americans want to know that the representatives they elect will ensure our government benefits them. Censure may be an unfair practice that doesn’t dole out the deserved punishment to politicians who act inappropriately and take unfair advantage with their positions. Fortunately there are hard working citizens in the legal system such as a Houston Jones Act Lawyer and political experts who are ready to defend the rights of US citizens.

no comments

Comments are closed.